Web3 Development Company.

It designs, builds, tests and deploys the on-chain part of a product: the smart contracts that hold logic and value, the infrastructure that indexes and serves chain data, and the application layer users interact with. In our case it also covers the security work around that code, including threat modeling, invariant testing and audit preparation.

It depends almost entirely on how much value the contracts will hold and how novel the mechanism is. A standard token with vesting is a small, well-understood build. A new lending or AMM mechanism carries economic risk that has to be modeled and tested, which is where most of the effort goes. We scope against those risks and quote a fixed price for defined work, or run an embedded team where the roadmap is still moving.

We do internal security review, invariant and fuzz testing, and full audit preparation, and that materially reduces both the cost and the findings count of an external audit. We still recommend an independent third-party audit before mainnet for anything holding meaningful value. A team auditing its own code has an obvious blind spot, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.

Most of our work is on Ethereum and the EVM ecosystem, including Base, Arbitrum, Optimism and Polygon, plus Solana for Rust-based work. We pick the chain against your users, liquidity and cost constraints rather than defaulting to whichever is fashionable.

Yes. A large share of our work starts as an inherited repository that needs to be understood, made safe and then moved forward. We begin with an architecture and security review so you get an honest written picture of what you have before anyone commits to a roadmap.

A focused contract system with a frontend typically runs six to twelve weeks to production. A full DeFi protocol with novel mechanism design, an audit cycle and a mainnet launch is usually three to six months. We give a real timeline after a scoping conversation, not before it.